Rhett Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

WPMB/1276/2004 of BACHI RAM Vs ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE and ANOTHER on 29 December 2004

1276 of 2004 (MB) Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Sri Tumul Nainwal for the petitioner and Sri S.K. Jain for the respondent. The writ petition is directed against the recovery proceedings. Sri S. K. Jain has submitted that no recovery proceedings are going on against the petitioner. The counsel for

Conclusion

W.P. No. 1276 of 2004 (MB) Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J.

Heard Sri Tumul Nainwal for thepetitioner and Sri S.K. Jain for therespondent.

The writ petition is directed againstthe recovery proceedings. Sri S. K. Jain hassubmitted that no recovery proceedingsare going on against the petitioner. Thecounsel for the petitioner has submittedthat he has filed a representation on22.9.2003 before the respondent. Therespondent is directed to decide therepresentation of the petitioner withinthree weeks after the receipt of thecertified copy of this order.

The recovery proceedings, if any,shall remain in abeyance for a period of threeweeks only.

Subject to the aforesaid observation,

the writ petition is disposed of.

29.12.2004

(Rajesh Tandon, J.)

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead