Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./7659/2006 of M. ANITHA Vs SHO, CHAKKARACKAL P.S. & ANOTHER on 29 December 2006

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DECEMBER 2006 / 8TH POUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7659 of 2006() ----------------------------- (CR.NO.211/06 OF CHAKKARAKKAL POLICE STATION) PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN

FRIDAY, THE 29TH DECEMBER 2006 / 8TH POUSHA 1928

Bail Appl..No. 7659 of 2006()

-----------------------------

(CR.NO.211/06 OF CHAKKARAKKAL POLICE STATION)

PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED

---------------------------------------

MRS.M.ANITHA,

W/O.PRAMODAN, RESIDING AT PARAMMEL HOUSE, P.O.MAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT EKKAL.

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

RESPONDENTS:

-------------

1. THE S.H.O. CHAKKARAKKAL POLICE STATION, KANNUR.

2. STATE OF KERALA,

REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 29/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

M.N.KRISHNAN, J

------------------------------------------- B.A.No.7659 OF 2006

Page 1 of 2

------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2006

O R D E R

This is an application for bail under Section 438 of theCr.P.C. The accused is alleged to have committed offencesunder Sections 454, 380 and 461 of I.P.C. The defactocomplainant and the accused are close relatives and it issubmitted that the accused had stolen some gold ornaments andthat had been recovered from the house of the accused.Learned counsel for the accused submits that the matter hasbeen talked over by the parties and learned Public Prosecutoralso submits that the recovery is over and further custody of theaccused is not necessary.

Considering the nature of the case, I am inclined to grantbail. Therefore the petition is allowed and the petitioner will bereleased on bail in the event of arrest on the followingconditions.

(i) She shall execute a bond for Rs.20,000/- with two solventsureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the officerarresting her.

BA.7659/06

Page numbers

(ii) She may make herself available for interrogation.

(iii) She shall not attempt to influence or intimidate anywitnesses.

(iv) This bail order shall be in force for a period of 30 days.

kkb.

M.N.KRISHNANJudge

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead