Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38106/2008 of PARVANA S.VINOD Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38106 of 2008(J) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ PARVANA S.VINOD, D/O.R.S.VINOD, RESIDING AT GAURI SANKARAN,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38106 of 2008(J)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------
PARVANA S.VINOD, D/O.R.S.VINOD,
RESIDING AT GAURI SANKARAN,
EASTNADA, SRA 114, SREEKANDESWARAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------
1. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE,
KERALA STATE SCHOOL YUVAJANOTSAVAM 2008-09
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT GOVT.H.S.S.
KILIMANNOOR,(DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM).
3. THE GENERAL CONVENOR,
THE KERALA STATE SCHOOL YUVAJANOTSAVAM 2008-09
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT GOVT.H.S.S.
KILIMANNOOR.
4. THE PROGRAMME COMMITTEE CONVENOR,
(NADODINRUTHAM)
THE KERALA STATE SCHOOL YUVAJANOTSAVAM 2008-09
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REVENUE DISTRICT GOVT.H.S.S.
KILIMANNOOR.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.MEERA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J============================W.P.(C).No.38106 of 2008===========================Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for thepetitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.Permission granted and the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,JUDGE
dvs