Uttarakhand High Court

C482/436/2008 of RAMESH GUPTA Vs STATE on 31 December 2008

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent- State. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated at Bar that the petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court. In view of the above statement, the

C-482 No. 436/2008

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder for the respondent- State.

The learned counsel for the petitioner stated at Bar that the petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court.

In view of the above statement, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.

V.K.

(J.C.S. Rawat, J.)

31.12.2008

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead