Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/12313/2022 of HIMANSHU AND ANR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (120) CRWP-12313-2022 Date of Decision:-30.12.2022. Himanshu and Anr. ……Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and Ors. ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Jagminder Singh, Advocate for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH

(120) CRWP-12313-2027.Date of Decision:-30.12.2022.

Himanshu and Anr.

Petitioners

Versus.

State of Punjab and Ors.|

...... Respond

CORAM:HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICEALOK JAIN

FE FE

Present:Mr. Jagminder Singh, Advocate for|Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhoria, Advocate the petitioners.

FE FE

ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)

The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article|226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to|protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. |

It is the case of the petitioners that they both are major)inasmuch as petitioner No.1 was born on 14.09.2002 and petitioner No.2|was born on 24.11.2001. Reliance has been placed upon Aadhaar Cards|(Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively). It is apparent from the Aadhaar|Card of petitioner No.1 that he is less than 21 years of age, and hence, they|have not yet got married.|

Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only. |

On advance notice, Mr. Deepanjay Sharma, DAG, Punjab,|appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 to 3 and on a|specific query put by this Court, he has stated that he has no objection in|

case, respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar|Mohali, Punjab, looks into the representation dated 26.12.2022 (Annexure|P-3) and takes appropriate action in accordance with law.

After considering the abovesaid facts, the present Criminal|Writ Petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into|the representation (Annexure P-3) and after considering the _ threaperception to the petitioners, respondent No.2 will take appropriate action|in accordance with law.

It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the Statefrom proceeding against the petitioners, if involved in any case.

(ALOK JAIN)JUDGE

December 30, 2022.manju

Whether speaking/reasoned:-Yes/NoWhether Reportable:-Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead