Gujarat High Court
AO/465/1992 of SADVICHAR PARIVAR Vs MARADIA CHEMICALS LTD., on 24 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No 465 of 1992 With APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.502 OF 1992 With CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4245 OF 1992 With CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4596 OF 1992 Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of
APPEAL FROM ORDER No 465 of 1992
With
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.502 OF 1992
With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4245 OF 1992
With
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4596 OF 1992
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
-------------------------------------------------------------- SADVICHAR PARIVAR
Versus
MARADIA CHEMICALS LTD.,
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Appeal from Order No. 465 of 1992
MR BHARAT R PANDYA for Appellant
MR MB GANDHI for Respondents
2. Appeal from OrderNo 502 of 1992
MR MB GANDHI for Petitioner
MR BHARAT R PANDYA for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE Y.B.BHATT
Date of decision: 24/11/98
1. Office objections are dispensed with (except court fees).
2. Learned counsel for the respective parties i.e. respective appellants state that the interests of justice would best be served by directing the trial court to hear and dispose of the suit as early as possible and within a prescribed time-frame. It is accordingly directed that the trial court shall hear and dispose of the Civil Suit No.2576/92 as expeditiously as possible and in any case not later than 31st March 1999.
3. In the meanwhile, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the present situation in respect of the property in dispute shall be maintained by both the parties. It is accordingly so directed.
4. On the basis of the aforesaid submissions and the consequential directions the above appeals are not pressed for any further orders and the same are accordingly disposed of with no orders as to costs.
5. Since the appeals have been disposed of, the Civil Applications therein also do not survive and are accordingly disposed of with no order as to costs.
6. The Registry is directed to send Yadi to the trial court forthwith i.e. not later than 30th November 1998. Direct service is also permitted.
24.11.1998����(Y.B. BHATT J.)