Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./8040/2007 of MANOJ Vs STATE OF KERALA on 24 December 2007

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 24TH DECEMBER 2007 / 3RD POUSHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 8040 of 2007() ---------------------------------- CRIME NO.170/03 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION ..... APPLICANT/ACCUSED. ---------------- MANOJ, AGED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN

MONDAY, THE 24TH DECEMBER 2007 / 3RD POUSHA 1929

Bail Appl..No. 8040 of 2007()

----------------------------------

CRIME NO.170/03 OF MULANTHURUTHY POLICE STATION.....

APPLICANT/ACCUSED.

----------------

MANOJ, AGED 27 YEARS,

S/O. KUNJAPPAN, MALEPPARAMBU HOUSE, KANAYANNUR

KARA, KANAYANNUR VILLAGE.

BY ADV. SRI.PAUL MATHEW (PERUMPILLIL)

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT & STATE.

-------------------

STATE OF KERALA,

REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U.NAZAR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

V.K. MOHANAN, J.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application NO.8040 of 2007

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24[th] day of December,2007.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

In this application filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner,who is the sole accused in Crime No.170/2003 of MulanthuruthyPolice Station, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelledagainst the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, Iam inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of thepolice station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for aperiod of one month in the event of his arrest in connection withthe above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupeesthe thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the likeamount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to thefollowing conditions:

1. Petitioner shall report before the InvestigatingOfficer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on allWednesdays.Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on allWednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself availablefor interrogation as and when required by theInvestigating Officer.for interrogation as and when required by theInvestigating Officer.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidatethe prosecution witnesses nor shall heattempt to tamper with the evidence for theprosecution.the prosecution witnesses nor shall heattempt to tamper with the evidence for theprosecution.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

5. Petitioner shall surrender before theMagistrate concerned and seek regular bail inthe meanwhile.Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail inthe meanwhile.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to becancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

kvm/-

V.K.MOHANAN,

JUDGE.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead