Kerala High Court
WP(C)/30825/2021 of S.VENU Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2021
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 10TH POUSHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 30825 OF 2021 PETITIONER: S.VENU, AGED 53 YEARS, HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (SANSKRIT), S.D.V.BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, ALAPPUZHA-688001. BY ADVS.SRI.K.JAJU
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 31[ST] DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 / 10TH POUSHA, 1943WP(C) NO. 30825 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
S.VENU,AGED 53 YEARS,HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (SANSKRIT), S.D.V.BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.) SRI. BRIJESH MOHAN SRI. M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
RESPONDENTS:
1STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
3THE MANAGER, SANATANA DHARMA VIDYASALA SCHOOLS (S.D.V.SCHOOLS),REGISTERED OFFICE, BASANT HALL, ALAPPUZHA-688001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER ADV. SRI. APPU P.S.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 31.12.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
Dated this the 31[st] day of December,2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is working as High School Teacher (Sanskrit) at the S.D.V. Boys High School under thethird respondent. By Ext.P1, the petitioner was placedunder suspension. Later, pursuant to Ext.P5, this Courtdirected an enquiry to be conducted to the chargeslevelled against the petitioner. The petitioner wasreinstated in service on 19.08.2020. The secondrespondent passed Ext.P6 order treating the period ofsuspension from 04.09.2019 to 26.03.2020 as LeaveWithout Allowance. Challenging Ext.P6 to the extentaggrieved, the petitioner filed Ext.P7 revision petitionbefore the Government. The limited prayer of thepetitioner in this writ petition is for a direction todispose of Ext.P7 by the first respondent.
2. and the learned Government Pleader.
Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner
3. In the nature of the relief I propose to passnotice to the third respondent is dispensed with.
4. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the nature of the limited relief prayed for by thepetitioner in the writ petition, the first respondent isdirected to consider Ext.P7 revision petition withnotice to the petitioner and the third respondentwithin a period of three weeks from the date of receiptof a certified copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN,JUDGE
DST/31.12.21
//True copy/P.A.To Judge
W.P.(C)No.30825/2021
APPENDIX
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL