Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./7872/2007 of P.K.KARTHIKEYAN Vs STATE OF KERALA on 24 December 2007
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 24TH DECEMBER 2007 / 3RD POUSHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 7872 of 2007() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO.736/2007 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM) : PETITIONER/ACCUSED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
MONDAY, THE 24TH DECEMBER 2007 / 3RD POUSHA 1929
Bail Appl..No. 7872 of 2007()
-----------------------------
(CRIME NO.736/2007 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM)
: PETITIONER/ACCUSED
-----------------------------------
P.K.KARTHIKEYAN, S/O.KELAN,
AGED 72 YEARS, PLOT NO.14, PRESS CLUB COLONY, PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY-682 024.
BY ADV. SMT.M.V.RETNAMMA
SRI.V.K.SUBRAMANIAN
SRI.K.B.HARSHAN
SRI.P.S.PRADEEP
SRI.M.K.SASEENDRAN
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT
------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CENTRAL POLICE
STATION, ERNAKULAM THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. S.U.NAZAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 24/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
V.K.MOHANAN, J.
--------------------------------
Bail Application No. 7872 of 2007 -------------------------------- Dated this the 24[th] day of December, 2007
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is an accused in Crime No.736/2007 of Central Police Station for theoffences punishable under secs.465, 467, 420, 120b and 419 of IPC ,seeks anticipatory Bail.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.
3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case involvingsuch grave offence. It is too early to accept the petitioner'scontention that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. There isno reason why the petitioner should not surrender before themagistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if thepetitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned within twoweeks from today and files an application for regular bail, the sameshall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same day onwhich it is filed bearing in mind the decision in Sukumari v. Stateof Kerala (2001 (1) KLT 22).
With the above observation, this Application is disposed of .
KVM/-
V.K.MOHANAN, JUDGE.
kvm/-