Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38189/2008 of SUDHAKARAN Vs TAHSILDAR, NEYYATINKARA AND 2 OTHERS on 26 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38189 of 2008(U) -------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09/12/2008 IN IA 1813/2008 IN OS.392/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT,ATTINGAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38189 of 2008(U)
--------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09/12/2008 IN IA 1813/2008 IN
OS.392/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT,ATTINGAL
....................
PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------
SUDHAKARAN, AGED 48,S/O.APPUKUTTAN, RESIDING AT 'THEJAS', KARICHAYIL,CHITTATTINKARA DESOM, AVANAAVANCHERRY VILLAGE,ATTINGAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.A.B.MOHANAKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------
1.THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,STATUE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2.THE TAHSILDAR, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK,TALUK OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, NEYYATTINKARA.TALUK OFFICE, CIVIL STATION, NEYYATTINKARA.
3.RAJENDRAN, SON OF SADANANDAN, RESIDING AT R.S.NIVAS, MANAMBOOR VILLAGE, MANAMBOOR P.O.,CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK.R.S.NIVAS, MANAMBOOR VILLAGE, MANAMBOOR P.O.,CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. AMJAD ALI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.N.Ravindran, J.
=====================
W.P(C).No.38189 of 2008
=====================
Dated this the 26[th] day of December, 2008.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission towithdraw the Writ Petition reserving liberty with the petitioner tochallenge Ext.P4 order in other appropriate proceedings. Leave grantedas prayed for and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn reservingliberty with the petitioner to challenge Ext.P4 order of the civil court inother appropriate proceedings. The contentions of the petitioner arekept open.
ess 26/12
P.N.Ravindran,Judge.