Kerala High Court

AS/2/1953 of DROUPATHI Vs PADMAVATHI on 26 July 1954

t 'Appeal S:;.i t no. 2 of 1~)53 • In the High Cpurt of Travancorc -Cochin. . • Before . J ·. TMf Hon I bif.e. Shr-'.. P .K. Subramania Iyer,. Judge. ·. · The Hon'ble dhri Joseph ~Vithsyathil~ Judge.. . . . . . • . . 3y ac1vocste Er.Barna Shc::.1oi. - - O

..f.[.][·]..k':i#"/X •·.._J··Ii'.I.O • .s. .s..r:o.Droroouathi,Lpa·l l • ,L1l l • ,L1 l • ,L1a • ,L1 ,L1L1lll1lll1T·l l • ,L1pa·l l • ,L1l l • ,L1 l • ,L1a • ,L1 ,L1L1lll1_if, Pf(;a, urart:o··bcani,•f,Padmii)i)admdm'11ii)Padmii)i)admdmn.biJ Villilllllage,-rrt on the IS. .,,.,_...-'"1 ._,):.'.·'·-_.- •In the High Cpurt of Travancorc -Cochin..•Before.·. TMf Hon[I]bif.e. Shr-'.. P .K. Subramania Iyer,. Judge..•Before.·. TMf Hon[I]bif.e. Shr-'.. P .K. Subramania Iyer,. Judge.·.J· The Hon'ble dhri Jose.ph ~Vith.s.ya.thil~. Judge..'Appeal S:;.i t no.2 of1~)53 •'Appeal S:;.i t no.2 of1~)53 •

--

O • .s. .s..r:o.167 of 1122 of the jikaimal District Court.

«.3

Droroouathi,daughter ofWeenakshi, residing at Thazhum-3T·l l • ,L1pa·l l • ,L1l l • ,L1 l • ,L1a • ,L1 ,L1L1lll1_if, Pf(;a, urart:o··bcani,•n:::-ta1,.,,,.-mane sayw<=:larn-nt1mu FrG.....-...adlinu}K' •al'•a•. Ai- Mppeu l:r1ia,n1':1t-atdetfanendcheanriti-·n the lower t$court.

3y ac1vocste Er.Barna Shc::.1oi.

'11ii)Padmii)i)admdmnm.b.,..,avaastthiG,...a,·tedaRg0gahdt'e, fr o--amfe Rswaa,::ra Fars ±an,..,alcddi .kne'rj.a,r. raie•s Bi. rudirni•g,_· i'i"i'na t Bt ta.anirc. h eavirr P1.a:ramba,iiJ Villilllllage, iochin anavannur alk-.Respondent-PL£f. in lower court. ±

This app-ea 1 having: oen finally: hear-d: on '26. 7.1954 thecourt on thesame day deliv':!red the following.

Judgment.

1Delivered by Subr~mania Iyer J.J.

Page 1 of 3

The only~Joint pr·~ s sedbefore us b:,.-';3ri :Rama Shenoi, lcsrned counsel for the a p1fr Jlant, is,.· as regards the .me sne profitsdecreed against his client y the court belo.. "e arguesthattheh'decree of the court belo has declared that.the possession of theippellant isthtt of aposs3ssory mortgageeentitled to.get ~.1300.by way of mortgage money· as also the value of improvements fiied bythe court below.This part of the decree has·not beenchallenged bytheplaintiff re~pondent.Therefore,it stands.The resuliis thatthe possession of the appellant is rightful and ha's been r.ightfulJtfor all the relevant per-iod.To bold- that the n~;pellant' spossessic,~1I.iswrongful which is necessary to render him liable formesne profits!awould be inconsistent with the decree which ~efinitely declareshis4possession to be thatoT a possessory mortgagee,and therefore -/._absolutely rightful~The part oftbe decree of the court. below)re8ldering the appellant L.., b-le for me sne profits fro;n 30.11.1116,Jt[½]lo[m]'CO'~~'·-c.t~L,(;~o· -f ~l.:Jx V•,the deed'.)f sale}n favour of the a_ppelJ_ant,cannotf·bes-ustained.1t is this5c,edo? sale whtcb hasgot metanaphos~d1-into a possessory mortgageon account of the decreeof the court1Jclo•N.Thntpart of the decree of the court belowwhich rEl'"ders theappellant liabl~ formesnc profitspast and future is vacated.;·....._:1 );-_, ,· ...:.

...

•

•1

app,2a-'" 1s. al1owc,d· t.::,-::::e above .lir::ited extent and. t•,..,,, decree· of thocourt bolo.zodiisd..Te remaining portionof the'decree of t':e

Page 2 of 3

2. ::-_2e:·:·2-:1:.,elm'i has not fixed a t:i..me within which theamounts iue ts ze appellant should be deposited in.court.LearreCc o±.-° - te appellan t pressed that a time :for such deposit beexec .::.-'::e t~e d~cree for reaL.sntion of the amount by sale of the -;_·,r J ~:.-:::.'ties.7.'e ,,,:.0therµfore,direct that the. rt: spondeht' IJlaintiff do!·::e;:osite aount payable to the app,e_lb:1pt.in cour.t on or befor<?3Ct~ o~ :~nuary 1955 andthatin'efault the appellant be entitledc cecuta the decree or r9covary of the amount ofs.1300 as also} v:::1·~-=- of ir:.~;rovements due to him-cy sale of the;Jro~-J:::rties compris,3c"lsta~ces of the case wu directboth parties to pay themselves theirres-pective cOsts ,in this 8!J}Jeal.26.7.1S54.Sd. l?. ::: • Subr amania Iyer, Jude •.Sd.Joseph Vithayathil, Judge.

'cop"y;

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead