Kerala High Court
Crl.Rev.Pet/3039/2011 of RAJU ANTONY Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/ CRRP.No. 3039 of 2011 ( ) ------------ CRA.233/2010 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA ST.225/2008 of J.M.F.C. - II, MAVELIKKARA --------------- REVISION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2011/
CRRP.No. 3039 of 2011 ( )
------------
CRA.233/2010 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA
ST.225/2008 of J.M.F.C. - II, MAVELIKKARA
---------------
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:
1.RAJU ANTONYS/O.ANTONY, KARACKAL, CHANGANASSERY,S/O.ANTONY, KARACKAL, CHANGANASSERY, MARKET P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR
SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINTANT/COMPLAINANT
.....................
1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2.SUJATHA K.G., AGED, 39 YEARS,
W/O.MOHANAN, KULANGARATHU HOUSE, KANDIYOOR,THATTARAMBALAM, MAVELIKKARA PIN 690 514.
SRI.S.R.SREEJITH
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 30.12.2011 , THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
----------------------------
Crl.M.A.No.10972 OF 2011
&Crl.R.P.No.3039 OF 2011
-----------------------------
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
~~~~~~~
Assailing the conviction and sentence for offence underSection 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in S.T.No.225/2008as confirmed in Crl.A.No.233/2010 on the file of the AdditionalSessions Judge, Mavelikkara, this Revision Petition is filed. Alongwith the Revision Petition, a petition under Section 147 of theNegotiable Instruments Act is filed.
2. Having heard either side, I find no reason to dismissthe petition. Therefore, the petition is recorded. The revisionpetitioner would stand acquitted under Section 320(6) of the Codeof Criminal Procedure read with Section 147 of the NegotiableInstruments Act. The petitioner shall deposit Rs.3000/- (Rupeesthree thousand only) before the Kerala State Legal ServicesAuthority within one month and produce the receipt before thisCourt. In default, the petitioner shall undergo simpleimprisonment for two months.
Crl.R.P. is disposed of as above.
ps/30/12
(P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE)