Kerala High Court
WP(C)/31253/2012 of PARAKKAL KRISHNAN Vs THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 31253 of 2012 (F) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- PARAKKAL KRISHNAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C).No. 31253 of 2012 (F)
---------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
PARAKKAL KRISHNAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O. P.M.THIRUMULPADU (LATE), HOUSE NO. XXXII/1484 MANJERI VILLAGE, KOVILAKOM ROAD, MANJERI P.O. MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR
SRI.K.RAKESH
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF MALAPPURAM, PIN-676505.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
MANJERI CIRCLE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676121.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. SHYSON P MANGUZHA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC NO. 31253/2012
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1- TRUE COPY OF THE PARTNERSHIP DEED EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS DATED 10-11-2008.PETITIONER AND OTHERS DATED 10-11-2008.
EXHIBIT P2- TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED, 6-12-2012 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER. PETITIONER.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS - NIL
// TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE
SD
K.M.JOSEPH & K.HARILAL, JJ
------------------------------------------------- W.P(C) No. 31253 of 2012
-------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J
Petitioner has approached this Court complaining thealleged police harassment. According to the petitioner, thedisputes between the petitioner and his sister are purely civil innature.
2. Learned Government Pleader on getting instructionssubmits that a complaint was received from one Viswanathan,one of the partners of the petitioner's firm. On the basis of thesame, summons was issued to one Muneer and Sameer callingupon them to produce document for erecting the hoardings. It issubmitted that no crime has been registered as against thepetitioner and that the petitioner will not be harassed in thismatter.
We record the same and dispose of the matter.
Sd/-
K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE
Sd/-
K.HARILAL, JUDGE