Kerala High Court
AS/27/1954 of PYLO THOMAS Vs MANICK BAVA on 24 August 1955
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF TRAVANCORE-COCHIN Present: The Hon'ble Shri G. Kumara Pillai, Wudge and The Hon'ble Shri M.S. Menon, Judge Appeal Sui No. 270 195l 0.S. No. 103 of 11244 0f the Alleppey District Court Appellants--defendants 5 and g 1. Pylo Thomas of Thottukadavil Kampakkaran Veettil-:
-IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF TRAVANCORECOCHIN
Present:
The Hon'ble Shri G. Kumara Pillai, Wudgeand The Hon'bleShri M.S. Menon,Judge Appeal Sui No. 270 195l
0.S. No.103 of 11244 0f the Alleppey District Court
--Appellantsdefendants 5 and g
--1.Pylo Thomas of Thottukadavil Kampakkaran Veettil: Kadakkarapally Muri, Vaylar Mekku Pakuthy, Shertallai > 2.Chacko Rocky of d9: do By advocate...sShr.i Vwere.Su_bramo6nian MoothathuandAdvocate General Respondent - plaintiff Manick Bava of Vettakkal, Paliyatharayil, residing at VadakkeyValam Tayil, Uzhuva Muri, Vylar Mekku Pakuthy By advocates M/s K.P. Abraham & K.T. Ninan This appeal suit having been finally heard on 24.8.1955, thecourt on the same day delivered the following
JUDGMENT
-This is an appeal against the decree in a redemption suit.Defendants 5 and 8 are the appellants.The only point pressed in-appeal related to the value of improvements payable by the plainti.ff.Since there is an express provision in the document thatvalue of improvements is payable only on the pattom basis and thedocument also provides for the ratem of capitalisation we seenothing improper in the award relating to this matter, except inregard to the valuation of the areca-nut trees and the jack trees.The plaintiff agrees in this court to pay the full value s claimedby the appellant in regard to these two items.We thereforeIenhance the value of improvements which the plaintiff has beendirected to pay by Indian Rs. 205.The appeal is allowed to thisextent and dismissed in other respects.As the appellant hasunnecessarily swollen the appealvaluation, we direct the parties : .2..to give and take proportiori'lte costs in this court calculatedon the valuation of the appeal given by the ·appellant in theappeal memoran4¼."ll·.'21.8.[1]55SD.-G, · KT:Il'-!ARA PJ:T ,LAI;JUDG::-1:SD. M.S. MENON, JUDGEcopy_ I,,-rDeputy RegistrarIFor Registrar· Appeal Suit No.27 of 1·954copyofjudgment f
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…