Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38224/2008 of ANJALI.V.K Vs DISTRICT SCHOOL YOUTH FESTIVAL 2008 on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38224 of 2008( A ) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- ANJALI.V.K., D/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, CHERUPUSHPAM GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38224 of 2008(A)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
ANJALI.V.K., D/O.KRISHNANKUTTY,
CHERUPUSHPAM GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VADDAKKUMCHERRY, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. DISTRICT SCHOOL YOUGH FESTIVAL 2008,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL CONVENOR & DEPUTY
DIRECTOR EDUCATION,
PALAKKAD REVENUE DISTRICT, PALAKKAD.
2. THE CHAIRMAN,
APPEAL COMMITTEE (YUVAJANOLSAVAM)
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR EDUCATION, PALAKKAD.
3. THE GENERAL CONVENOR,
STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM & ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
EDUCATION (GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. M.MEERA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 30/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 38224 OF 2008 A
----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] December,2008.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by rejection of the appeal as perExt.P1, by the appeal committee. The main ground on which theappeal was filed is that the programme was conducted in a classroom which was packed with audience viz., private parties and therewere obstructions in the performance of the item.
2. Learned Govt. Pleader on instruction submits that there isa difference of 14 marks between the petitioner and the firstcandidate.
3. I do not think that in this jurisdiction this Court will beable to sit in appeal over the decision of the appeal committee.Writ petition is dismissed.
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.
---------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO:
-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Dated: