Kerala High Court
Crl.Rev.Pet/1345/2023 of K.DINESHAN Vs A.P.K.VALSAN on 29 December 2023
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 8TH POUSHA, 1945 CRL.REV.PET NO. 1345 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 732/2012 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, TALIPARAMBA CRA 26/2016 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH
FRIDAY, THE 29[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 8TH POUSHA, 1945
CRL.REV.PET NO. 1345 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CC 732/2012 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, TALIPARAMBA
CRA 26/2016 OF DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT,THALASSERYREVISION PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
K.DINESHANAGED 62 YEARS, S/O LATE KONGINI RAGHAVAN, RESIDING AT TMC.XV-251, BEHIND RAJASTHAN MARBLE PALACE, KUTTIKOLE P.O, THALIPARAMBU TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670562
BY ADVS.P.V.THOMASTONY GEORGE THOMAS
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:
1A.P.K.VALSANAGED 62 YEARS, S/O LATE DAMODARAN NAMBIAR, RESIDING AT KOTTAKKANAM HOUSE, KOOVERY, THALIPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670581
2STATE OF KERALAREPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
BY ADVS.
SMT.NIMA JACOB, PP
SRI. P.R. AJITH KUMAR
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Page 1 of 4
G. GIRISH, J.
------------------
Crl.MA. No.5 of 2023
in
Crl.Rev.Pet. No.1345 of 2023----------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th ]day of December, 2023
O R D E R
The Revision Petitioner, along with the 1[st]respondent, has filed this petition under Section147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act r/w Section482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, forcompounding the case and for terminating theprocedures.
2. The revision petitioner was the accusedin CC No.732/2012 of the Judicial First ClassMagistrate Court, Thaliparamba. He wasconvicted and sentenced by the learned
Page 2 of 4
Magistrate for the commission of offence underSection 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act.Since, the conviction was upheld in appeal, hepreferred the present revision against the 1[st]respondent.
3. Now, that it is submitted by the learnedcounsel for the revision petitioner, as well as thelearned counsel for the 1[st] respondent, that theissue has been amicably settled between theparties and that there is no claim whatsoeversubsisting from the revision petitioner to the 1[st]respondent.
4. Having regard to the above facts relatingto the settlement of the dispute between theparties, I feel that, it is necessary to terminate thisrevision proceedings as well as all further
Page 3 of 4
proceedings consequent to the impugnedjudgments of the courts below.
In the result, the petition is stand allowed.
The case which was numbered as CC No.732/2012of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court,Thaliparamba, which resulted in the presentrevisionproceedings,standslawfully compounded. The petitioner/accused is acquittedunder Section 320(8) of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 147 ofthe Negotiable Instrument Act.
Sd/-
nvj
G. GIRISH
JUDGE
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…