Kerala High Court
WP(C)/25402/2019 of RAJAN S Vs THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER on 31 December 2019
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.25402 OF 2019( A ) PETITIONER: RAJAN S AGED 47 YEARS S/O SADANANTHA PANNICKER, POOVANVILA VEEDU, VADACODE, PERUMPAZHUTHOOR P.O.NEYYATTINKARA,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941
WP(C).No.25402 OF 2019(A)
PETITIONER:
RAJAN S
AGED 47 YEARSS/O SADANANTHA PANNICKER, POOVANVILA VEEDU, VADACODE,PERUMPAZHUTHOOR P.O.NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 126.
BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SASITH
RESPONDENTS:
1THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER
PALAYAM-AIRPORT RD, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL
JUNCTION, RIGHIMANGALAM, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695 035.
2THE SUPERINTENDENT,DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 121.
SMT. PRINCY XAVIER, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of December 2019
The petitioner is said to have been running a canteen in the compound of the District GeneralHospital, Neyyatinkara. However, in the year 2017, thecanteen was closed down for renovation. The petitionerwas under the legitimate expectation that the canteenwould be handed over to him after the renovation work.However, the respondents have not handed overpossession of the canteen to the petitioner. Thepetitioner now apprehends that the respondents are nowattempting to give the canteen to some of their closeassociates.
2. In the above circumstances, the petitioner hassubmitted that Ext.P3 representation dated 03/09/2019,which is pending consideration before the 2[nd]respondent. The petitioner contends that, despitependency of the representation, no orders have beenpassed on the same.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitionerand the learned Government Pleader. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that Ext.P3 representation is pending before the 2[nd]respondent and no orders have been passed.
Having regard to the fact that Ext.P3 is pendingbefore the 3[rd] respondent, I direct the 2[nd] respondent to consider Ext. P3 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders on it as expeditiously as is possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Nsd
SD/-
C.S.DIAS
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE CANTEENRUNNING IN THE COMPOUND OF THE DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL, NEYYATINKARA.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF ITEMS AND COST OF THE ARTICLES BOUGHT FOR RUNNING THE CANTEEN
EXHIBIT P3
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESE3NTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 3.9.2019
EXHIBIT P4
TRUE COPY OF TENDER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT.