Uttarakhand High Court

WRIT PETITION 912 of 2010 on 31 December 2010

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Hon. Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate, present for the petitioners. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder, present for the State.

By means of this petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have sought quashing of the first information report dated 28.06.2010, registered as Crime No. 115 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of I.P.C., police station Kankhal, District Haridwar.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State, mentioning that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed against the petitioners.

In view of the above development, this writ petition for quashing of the first information report, has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. Interim order dated 26.10.2010, passed by this court, stands vacated.

(Prafulla C. Pant, J.)31.12.2010

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead