Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./10858/2011 of ARUN BABU Vs THE STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10858 of 2011() ------------------------------ (Crime No.1652/2011 of Sasthamkottah Police Station, Kollam) APPLICANTS/ACCUSED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN

FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933

Bail Appl..No. 10858 of 2011()

------------------------------

(Crime No.1652/2011 of Sasthamkottah Police Station, Kollam)

APPLICANTS/ACCUSED

--------------------------------------

1. ARUN BABU,

(AGED 30 YEARS, S/O.VIJAYAKUMAR),

PINNATTU PUTHEN VEEDU, PUTENAMBALAM,

KUNNATHUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DIST.

2. SHARANDAS

(AGED 20) S/O.SIVADASAN,

SETHULAKSHMI BHAVAN, IVERKALA,

PUTHENAMBALAM P.O., KOLLAM DIST.

BY ADV. SRI.S.ABDUL RAZZAK

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA,

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

SASTHAMKOTAH, KOLLAM DIST.

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Sri.P.S.ABDUL KAREEM

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30/12/2011,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

P.S.GOPINATHAN, J.

----------------------------

B.A.No.10858 OF 2011

-----------------------------

Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2011

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

~~~~~~~

Petition under Section 438 of the Code of CriminalProcedure. Petitioners are the accused Nos. 1 and 2 in CrimeNo. 1652/2011 of Sasthamkottah Police Station for offencespunishable under Sections 153A and 427 read with 34 I.P.C.Apprehending arrest, detention and torture at the hands of theInvestigating Officer, this petition is filed seeking an orderdirecting the respondents to release the petitioners on bail inthe event of arrest with a plea that they are innocent of theallegations.

2. Having heard either side it is revealed that under theshade of the Mullaperiyar dam the petitioners had waylaid alorry and committed mischief and therefore this is not a fit caseto invoke jurisdiction under section 438 of the Code of CriminalProcedure.

3. In the result, this petition is disposed of withdirection to the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating B.A.No.10858/2011

Officer. The Investigating Officer, after interrogation, shallproduce the petitioners before the Magistrate concerned, so asto enable them to apply for regular bail, which the Magistrateshall dispose of on merits, as far as possible on the same day,provided, due notice is given to the Assistant Public Prosecutor.

ps/30/12

(P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead