Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/592/2003 of SATISH CHANDRA GUPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS on 31 December 2003
UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL COURT NO. 2 Writ Petition No. 592 (S/B) 2003 Dr. Satish Chandra Gupta S/o B.L. Gupta, Presently posted as, SAI Camp, Sitarganj Distt. U.S. Nagar. ….Petitioner Vs. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, And four others. ….Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 592 (S/B) 2003
Dr. Satish Chandra Gupta S/o B.L. Gupta, Presently posted as, SAI Camp, Sitarganj Distt. U.S. Nagar. ….Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, And four others.
….Respondents
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, A.C. J.Hon’ble Rajesh Tandon, J.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to decide the option submitted by the petitioner for retention of his service in the State of Uttar Pradesh and to relieve him accordingly at a very early date.
Heard Sri S.C. Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for Union of India.
The petitioner, who is presently attached as Doctor of the Jail Camp, Sitraganj has opted for State of Uttar Pradesh. The Option of the petitioner was to be either accepted or rejected by the Central Govt. under Section 73(2) of the U.P. Reorganization Act 2000 on the basis of advice given by the Advisory Committee constituted under Section 76 of the Act. But the recommendation has yet not been send by the Advisory Committee for consideration in the option matter of the petitioner.
Therefore, we provide that in case the representation/option of the petitioner is pending before the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board shall decide the same and submit its recommendation expeditiously. After receipt of the recommendation of the Board, the Central Govt. shall take decision expeditiously under Section 73 of the Act.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Dated 31.12.2003:
NCM: