Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./7433/2006 of SUJITH Vs STATE OF KERALA on 26 December 2006

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2006 / 5TH POUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 7433 of 2006() ----------------------------- CRMP.4915/2006 of J.M.F.C., SASTHAMCOTTA CRIME NO.68/06 OF SASTHAMCOTTA EXCISE RANGE. ....................

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

TUESDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2006 / 5TH POUSHA 1928

Bail Appl..No. 7433 of 2006()

-----------------------------

CRMP.4915/2006 of J.M.F.C., SASTHAMCOTTA

CRIME NO.68/06 OF SASTHAMCOTTA EXCISE RANGE.

....................

: PETITIONER/ACCUSED

-----------------------------------

SHRI SUJITH, S/O.SURENDRAN,

SUJITH BHAVANAM, NADUVILEMURI,

IVERKALA, KUNNATHOOR.

BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT

------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR,

SASTHAMCOTTA EXCISE RANGE.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI K.S.SIVAKUMAR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 26/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

BAIL APPLICATION NO.7433 OF 2006

- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.68/06 of SasthamcottaExcise Range for offences punishable under sections 8(1) and 8(2) ofthe Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 5 litersof arrack and 140 liters of wash on 27.10.2006 and who was arrestedon the same day, seeks his enlargement on bail.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor on instructions admitted that nofinal report has been filed even after 60 days of detention of thepetitioner in judicial custody. If so, by virtue of the proviso to section167(2) Cr.P.C., the petitioner is entitled to bail as of right.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on hisexecuting a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only)with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe J.F.C.M.,Sasthamcotta and subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall report before the InvestigatingOfficer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on allWednesdays.Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on allWednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available forinterrogation as and when required by the Police, till thefiling of the final report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidatethe prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt totamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offencewhile on bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions,the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

dsn

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead