Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./9539/2012 of AJIMON K.A Vs STATE OF KERALA on 31 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 Bail Appl.No. 9539 of 2012 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO.588 OF 2011 OF ADIMALY POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT ACCUSED/PETITIONER:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN

MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934

Bail Appl.No. 9539 of 2012 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO.588 OF 2011 OF ADIMALY POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT

ACCUSED/PETITIONER:--------------------- AJIMON K.A, AGED 41 YEARS S/O.ACHUTHAN, KARIYAKKATHARAVELI HOUSE KACHUKULANGAARA CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA

BY ADV. SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

---------------

STATE OF KERALA REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM

R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT LALIZA T Y

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

P.BHAVADASAN, J

----------------------------------------- B.A No.9539 of 2012--------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

In view of the order dated 6.12.2012 in B.A No.8602/2012 bywhich one of the accused has granted bail, this Court finds no reasonto take a different view in respect of the petitioner, who is similarlyplaced. The petition is allowed as follows:

i)The petitioner shall surrender before theInvestigating Officer on or before 9.1.2013, who afterinterrogation shall produce him before the JFCM concernedand on an application for bail moved by the petitioner, thelearned Magistrate shall release the petitioner on bail on hisexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum eachto the satisfaction of the said Court.

ii)The learned Magistrate shall ensure the identity ofthe sureties and also the veracity of the tax receipts beforegranting bail.

Iii)The petitioner shall appear before the InvestigatingOfficer concerned for interrogation as and when required byhim until further orders.

iv)The petitioner shall not tamper or attempt totamper with the evidence or influence or try to influence thewitness.

v)If any of the condition is violated, the bail grantedshall stand cancelled and the JFCM concerned, on beingsatisfied of the said fact, may take such proceedings as areavailable to him in law.

P.BHAVADASAN

Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead