Kerala High Court

Crl.MC/4230/2009 of ABDUL SHAMEED Vs SHYJU.S AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2009

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 Crl.MC.No. 4230 of 2009() ------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14/12/2009 IN CRMP.3462/2009 IN CRA.425/2009 of SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM (ST.89/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.Q.BARKATH ALI

WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931

Crl.MC.No. 4230 of 2009()

-------------------------

AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14/12/2009 IN CRMP.3462/2009 IN

CRA.425/2009 of SESSIONS COURT, KOLLAM

(ST.89/2009 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-IV, KOLLAM)

....................

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED:

---------------------------------------------------- ABDUL SHAMEED,AGED 30,NOORJAHAN, SIVADASAMANGALAM,POLAYATHODU,MUNDAKKAL EAST, KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

SRI.SAIJO HASSAN

RESPONDENTS/2ND RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

----------------------------------------------------------------

1. SHYJU S,SUMA NIVAS,MUNDAKKAL WEST,KOLLAM.

2. STATE OF KERALA,

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.M. KAMAPPU

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

P.Q BARKATH ALI,J.------------------------- Crl.M.C No.4230 of 2009-------------------------- Dated this the 30th December,2009

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Petitioner is the accused in S.T No.89/2009 on the fileof the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court IV, Kollam andthe appellant in Crl.A No.425/09 of Sessions Court, Kollam.He was convicted under Section 138 of the NegotiableInstruments Act and was sentenced to undergo simpleimprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine ofRs.1,40,000/- and in default to undergo simpleimprisonment for two months. On appeal, the appellatecourt suspended the sentence but ordered him to remit1/5th of the cheque amount before the court below. Thepetitioner has challenged the said condition imposed bythe Sessions Court in Annexure -I order dated 14.12.2009directing him to remit 1/5th of the cheque amount.

2. It is alleged in the petition that the petitioner isnot in a position to raise any amount as he is financiallypoor and is suffering from decease and that therefore thecondition imposed by the Sessions Court directing him toremit 1/5th of the cheque amount may be lifted.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat the petitioner is a coolie worker and he is not doingwell. Taking into consideration that aspect, I feel that thepetitioner can be directed to remit Rs.10,000/- towards thecheque amount before the trial court.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted In the result, the petitioner is directed to remitRs.10,000/- before the trial court towards cheque amountinstead of 1/5th of the cheque amount.

P.Q BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

ma

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead