Kerala High Court
Con.Case(C)/2607/2022 of K.G.BHASKARAN NAIR Vs VISHNU RAJ IAS on 30 December 2022
OF 2022 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 2607 OF 2022 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 16014/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: K.G.BHASKARAN NAIR AGED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944CON.CASE(C) NO. 2607 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENTWP(C) 16014/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
K.G.BHASKARAN NAIRAGED 77 YEARSS/O GOURI AMMAANATHURUTHI HOUSE, "SRIRASHMI", VENGOOR, KIDANGOOR.P.O, ANGAMALY, ALUVA, PIN - 683572BY ADVS.K.P.SANTHITARA PREM
RESPONDENT/S:
VISHNU RAJ IAS(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), REVENUE DIVISINAL OFFICER, FORTKOCHI, PIN – 682001SRI.RENJITH T.R., SR.GPTHIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVEREDTHE FOLLOWING:
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
---------------------------------------
Cont. Case (C) No. 2607 of 2022inW.P.(C.) No. 16014 of 2021-------------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The above contempt case is filed alleging the violation ofthe directions in the judgment dated 12.8.2022 in W.P.(C.) No.16014 of 2021. Admittedly, Annexure-II order is passed. Thepetitioner is aggrieved by the same. According to the petitioner,that order is illegal and is not in compliance with the directionsof this Court. The petitioner is free to challenge that order inaccordance to law. There is no contempt in this case.
Therefore, this contempt case is closed with liberty to thepetitioner to challenge Annexure-II order.
SD/-
SKS
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2607 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 2607/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure ICERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12-8-2022 IN W.P.(C) NO. 16014 OF 2021 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURTAnnexure IITRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19-10-2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
Annexure IIITRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12-10-2022 OF THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER
Annexure IVTRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19-10-2022 WITH THE FORWARD NOTE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM