Uttarakhand High Court
BA1/1217/2009 of MATBAR SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2009
COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1217 of 2009 Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE Matbar Singh ……….Applicant (In Jail) Versus State of Uttarakhand ------- Opposite party
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Criminal Ist Bail Application No.1217 of 2009
Order on the Bail application of accused CRIMINAL SIDE
Matbar Singh
……….Applicant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
------- Opposite party
________________________________________________________
Arising out of Case Crime No.1 of 2009,
U/Ss 409/420/467/468/120-B IPC & 3/7 Essential Commodities Act, Revenue Police Kshetra Brahama Sari, District Tehri Garhwal Dated: December 31, 2009
Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.
Heard Sri R.S. Sammal, Advocate for the applicant and Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Counter affidavit filed today in the Court on behalf of the State be taken on record.
Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the only allegation against him in the FIR is that he has made wrong entries in the stock register. He further submitted that the stock register is being maintained by the Go-down Keeper and he is not at all authorized to maintain the same. Further, he is in jail since 11.11.2009 and he is a senior supply inspector and he has got no criminal history before this case.
After considering all the facts and circumstances, on hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the contents of the FIR and also on perusal of other material on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage.
Let the applicant Matbar Singh be released on bail his executing a personal bond and also on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Tehri Garhwal.
The bail application is allowed accordingly. (Urgency application No.3607/09 also stands disposed of)
31.12.2009Rajeev Dang
(Dharam Veer, J.)