Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42119/2017 of MADHU SOODANAN MAVILA VEETIL Vs REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 42119 of 2017 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------------- 1. MADHU SOODANAN MAVILA VEETTIL., S/O. KUNHIKANNAN NAMBIAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 42119 of 2017 (L)
----------------------------
PETITIONER:
--------------------------
1. MADHU SOODANAN MAVILA VEETTIL.,S/O. KUNHIKANNAN NAMBIAR P.V.,CHANDROTH HOUSE., THAZHE CHOVVA POST.,KANNUR 670 018
2.FAISAL C.H.,
S/O. LATHEEF M,
CHERIANDI HOUSE, KADALAYI POST,KANNUR DISTRICT 670 007
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1.REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY.,
KANNUR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,KANNUR- 670 002
2.REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,KANNUR 670 002
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.C. VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sdr/-
WP(C).No. 42119 of 2017 (L)
------------------------------------------ APPENDIX
------------------
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS--------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION WITH RESPECT TO KL-13-AL-1206
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 12.12.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED NIL TENDERED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXT.P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION WITH RESPECT TO KL-58-E-9931 TO KL-58-E-9931
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 7.1.2017 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER
EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED NIL TENDERED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.1.2017 IN WPC NO. 1180 OF 2017 OF THIS HONOURBALE COURT OF THIS HONOURBALE COURT
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITSNIL
---------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/
PA TO JUDGE
sdr/-
----------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.42119 OF 2017
----------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
I see that issues similar to those raised in this writpetition have already been considered by another learnedSingle Judge which has culminated in a judgment reportedas Rajesh v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority(2014(3) KLT 341). I am in respectful confirmation ofthe directions contained therein. I therefore see noreason to deviate there from.
2. I see that the petitioners are contract carriagepermit holders of autorickshaws. They say that they haveobtained orders from the State Appellate TransportTribunal for varying the said permit. They have filed thiswrit petition seeking directions to the respondents toreceive the fee for application for variation of the permitand also for a direction that they be issued the permit interms of the orders of the State Appellate Transport W.P.(C) NO.42119/ 2017 2
Tribunal.
3. In view of the judgment above referred I dispose ofthis writ petition also directing the respondents to issuepermit of the petitioners as applied for them inconformity with the judgment of the State AppellateTransport Tribunal, Ernakulam, within a period of onemonth from the date of receipt of a certified copy of thisjudgment.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
IAP