Kerala High Court
WP(C)/37754/2009 of BABIL MOIDUNNY Vs THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TEC on 30 December 2009
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931 WP(C).No. 37754 of 2009(L) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- BABIL MOIDUNNY, S/O.K.A.K. MOIDUNNY, AGED 26, RESIDING AT PAZHOOR HOUSE,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2009 / 9TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 37754 of 2009(L)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
BABIL MOIDUNNY,
S/O.K.A.K. MOIDUNNY, AGED 26,
RESIDING AT PAZHOOR HOUSE, TC-50/2249,
PRIYADARSHINI NAGAR, AYYANTHOLE P.O.,
THRISSUR-680 003.
BY ADV. SRI.SAIJU S.
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE
AND TECHNOLOGY REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-22, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS,
THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY, THRIKKAKARA, KOCHI-22,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAI,SC,COCHI U FOR R1 & 2
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
Page 1 of 2
ON 30/12/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S.SIRI JAGAN, J
-----------------------------
------------------------------
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2009.
J U D G M E N T
Aggrieved by the results of his fourth semester B.Tech degree examination held in May 2009, the petitioner submitted Ext.P1application for revaluation of the answer paper. The petitionercomplains of delay in completing the revaluation process.
2. The learned standing counsel for the University submitsthat the University would require at least two more month's time tocomplete the revaluation process.
3. Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petitionwith a direction to the respondents to complete the revaluationprocess for which the petitioner has applied by Ext.P1 and publishthe results thereof as expeditiously as possible, at any rate withinsix weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment,provided the application is in order in all respects. If the petitionersucceeds on revaluation a revised mark list shall be issued to thepetitioner within one week from the date of application for thesame.
Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition S .SIRI JAGAN
ab
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…