Kerala High Court

Bail Appl./7749/2008 of MANOJ Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 7749 of 2008() ----------------------------- CMP.16324/2008 of J.M.F.C. - I, KARUNAGAPPALLY .................... (CRIME NO. 1229/2008 OF

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN

TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930

Bail Appl..No. 7749 of 2008()

-----------------------------

CMP.16324/2008 of J.M.F.C. - I, KARUNAGAPPALLY

....................

(CRIME NO. 1229/2008 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION)

PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

--------------------

MANOJ, S/O. KRISHNANKUTTY,

PUTHUKKATTU THARAYIL, MANAPPALLY VADAKKUM MURI, PAVUMBA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY.

BY ADV. SRI.A.AHZAR

RESPONDENT/STATE:

---------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION,

KARUNAGAPPALLY.

GOVT. PLEADER SRI. K.S. SIVAKUMAR.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD

ON 30/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE

FOLLOWING:

V.K. MOHANAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bail Application NO.7749/2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- -- Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2008.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

Petitioner is the second accused in crime No.1229/2008 of Karunagappally police station, in whichoffences alleged against accused are under Sections447, 324, 308, 427 r/w s. 34 of IPC. Petitioner is incustody from 10.12.2008.

2. I heard the learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances ofthe case, his further detention is not warranted. Hencebail can be granted to the petitioner on executing abond for Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) withtwo solvent sureties each for the like amount to thesatisfaction of the learned Judicial First ClassMagistrate and subject to the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall report before theInvestigating Officer between 9 a.m.and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.Investigating Officer between 9 a.m.and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himselfavailable for interrogation as andwhenrequiredbytheInvestigating Officer.available for interrogation as andwhenrequiredbytheInvestigating Officer.

3. The petitioner shall not influence orintimidatetheprosecutionwitnesses nor shall he attempt totamper with the evidence for theprosecution.intimidatetheprosecutionwitnesses nor shall he attempt totamper with the evidence for theprosecution.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offencewhile on bail.while on bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of theabove conditions, the bail granted to him shall beliable to be cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

V.K.MOHANAN,

JUDGE.

KMD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead