Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./7928/2008 of PRAJITH Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 7928 of 2008() ----------------------------- (CRIME NO. 518/2008 OF PUDUKAD POLICE STATION) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 2,5 & 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930
Bail Appl..No. 7928 of 2008()
-----------------------------
(CRIME NO. 518/2008 OF PUDUKAD POLICE STATION)
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 2,5 & 6
---------------------------------------------------
1. PRAJITH @ KANNAN, AGED 21,
S/O.PREMAN, VATTEKKATTIL
KALLOOR, THRISSUR.
2. JITHIN @ JITHU, AGED 19
S/O.GOPI, MADATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE
KALLOOR MAVINCHUVADU,
THRISSUR DISTRICT
3. ANISH @ PAMBU ANISH, AGED 20,
S/O.VIJAYAN, VATTAPARAMBIL, KALLOR, THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.S. KAMAPPU
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 30/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
V. K.MOHANAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Bail Application NO.7928/2008
- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2008.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
Petitioners are accused Nos. 2, 5 and 6 in crime No.518/2008 of Puthukkad Police Station for the offencesunder Section 143, 147, 148, 452, 427 read withSection 149 of IPC and Section 20 read with Section 27 ofArms Act.
2. The allegation is that petitioners; accused Nos. 2,5 and 6 along with other accused formed into an unlawfulassembly armed with weapons committed mischief andcommitted criminal trespass into the house of de factocomplainant and caused damage. The incident was on11.09.08. However, the petitioners are in custody from04.12.2008.
3. This Court by order dated 17.10.2008 in BailApplication No. 6329/2008, bail was granted to the 7thaccused. So, I am also of the opinion that bail can begranted to the petitioners herein also. Accordingly, bail isgranted on the following terms and conditions:
dkm.
i. Petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.
25,000/ with two solvent sureties each for thelike amount to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate.
ii. Petitioner shall report before theInvestigating Officer on every Monday,Wednesday and Saturday between 10 A.M. and 1.P.M. until further orders.
iii. Petitioner shall not leave the limits of thepolice station within which crime is registeredwithout the prior permission of the learnedMagistrate.
iv. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate any witnesses or tamper with evidence or commitany offence while on bail and in case of breachof this condition, bail is liable to be cancelled.
This application is allowed as above.
V.K.MOHANAN,
JUDGE