Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./10770/2011 of NOBLE & OTHERS Vs STATE OF KERALA on 30 December 2011
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933 Bail Appl..No. 10770 of 2011() ------------------------------ (CRIME NO.597/2011 OF PEERUADE POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT) PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.GOPINATHAN
FRIDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2011 / 9TH POUSHA 1933
Bail Appl..No. 10770 of 2011()
------------------------------
(CRIME NO.597/2011 OF PEERUADE POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT)
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 8
------------------------
1. NOBLE, S/O. PHILIP,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
2. MANOHARAN, S/O. IRUDHAYAM,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
3. PRAVEEN, S/O. DEVADAS,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
4. RUBAN, S/O. JEEVADAS,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
5. PREM, S/O. MOHAN,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
6. PRAVEEN, S/O. MOHAN,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
7. JAYASEELAN, S/O. IRUDHAYAM,
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
8. GUNASEELAN, S/O. URUDHYAM,
Page 1 of 3
PAMPANAR ESTATE, PAMBANAR.P.O.PEERUMEDU VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM
SRI.PHILIP T.VARGHESE
BA.NO.10770/2011
RESPONDENT:
---------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM 682011, REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR
OF POLICE, PEERUMADE POLICE STATION.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.P.S.ABDUL KAREEM
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON 30.12.2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
P.S.GOPINATHAN, J.
----------------------------
B.A.No.10770 OF 2011
-----------------------------
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2011
O R D E R
~~~~~~~
Page 2 of 3
Petitioners who are the accused Nos. 1 to 8 in Crime No.597/2011 of Peerumade Police Station has filed a petition asB.A.No.9782/2011 under Section 438 of the Code of CriminalProcedure before this Court. By Annexure-A1 order thatpetition is dismissed. Now seeking the same relief, this petitionis filed.
2. Having heard either side, I find no reason to allowthis petition.
3. In the result, this petition is disposed of withdirection to the petitioners to surrender before the InvestigatingOfficer. The Investigating Officer, after interrogation, shallproduce the petitioners before the Magistrate concerned, so asto enable them to apply for regular bail, which the Magistrateshall dispose of on merits, as far as possible, on the same day,provided, due notice is given to the Assistant Public Prosecutor.
ps/30/12
(P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE)
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…