Kerala High Court
WP(C)/5480/2008 of DR.JOY GEORGE Vs SALES TAX OFFICERR on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C). No. 5480 of 2008 (B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: ---------- DR. JOY GEORGE, DR. JOY'S MEDILAB, CSI SQUARE, I FLOOR, SASTHRI ROAD KOTTAYAM - 685
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C). No. 5480 of 2008 (B)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:----------
DR. JOY GEORGE, DR. JOY'S MEDILAB,
CSI SQUARE, I FLOOR, SASTHRI ROAD
KOTTAYAM - 685 619.
BY ADV. SMT. S.K. DEVI
RESPONDENTS:
-----------
1. THE SALES TAX OFFICER,
DEPT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, II CIRCLE
TRIPUNITHURA 682 019.
2. THE TAHSILDAR,
TALUK OFFICE, CHANGANASSERY 686 001.
3. NINAN C GEORGE, 27/2986,
WATERLAND ROAD, CHILAVANOOR, KOCHI 682 030.
4. E.E. SULAIMAN, ELLIKKAL HOUSE,
CHILAVU P.O., THODUPUZHA 685 584.
5. P.P. JOY, PARELKUDIYIL HOUSE, RAJAKUMARI P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 508. RAJAKUMARI P.O., IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 508.
6. P.V. CHERIAN, PULLUKKATTU HOUSE, KAJANAPARA P.O., IDUKKI DIST. 685 561. KAJANAPARA P.O., IDUKKI DIST. 685 561.
R1&R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED SHAH
R3 BY ADVS. SRI. N. MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
SRI. V.K. SHAMUSUDHEEN
R5 BY ADV. SRI. ASHIM. M.V.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================W.P.(C) NO. 5480 OF 2008
===================
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is not pressing the writ petition. Accordingly, this writpetition is dismissed as not pressed.
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE