Kerala High Court

OP (MAC)/3139/2012 of P.C.ABOOBACKER Vs EANDI VASU on 31 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 OP (MACT).No. 3139 of 2012 (O) ------------------------------ OP(MV) 564/2006 of M.A.C.T. TIRUR PETITIONER(S): ------------- P.C.ABOOBACKER S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934

OP (MACT).No. 3139 of 2012 (O)

------------------------------

OP(MV) 564/2006 of M.A.C.T. TIRUR

PETITIONER(S):

-------------

P.C.ABOOBACKER

S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY

PALAKKAVALAPPIL CHERIYA OTTAYIL VEEDU

KOOTTAYI POST, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. EANDI VASU

S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY, PADINJAREKKARA P.O.

PURATHUR AMSOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. SANDHA, W/O.EANDY VASU,

PADINJAREKKARA P.O., PURATHUR AMSOM

TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

R1,R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.VENUGOPAL (1086/92)

THIS OP (MACT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ONTHE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS

/TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J

--------------------------------

OP(M.A.C.T.) NO. 3139 OF 2012

------------------------------------

Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

The only prayer urged at the time of hearing is for anexpeditious consideration of an application filed to set asidean ex-parte award supported by an application to condonedelay and to defer the execution proceedings in themeanwhile.

2. I direct the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirurto consider I.A. Nos. 3029/2012 and 3030/2012 in OP(MV) No.564/2006 on its file within a period of two months from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Furtherproceedings in E.P. No. 22/2012 in OP(MV) No. 564/2006 shallbe put on hold till orders are passed on I.A. Nos. 3029/2012and 3030/2012 as directed above within the time frame.

The Original Petition is disposed of.

ncd

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead