Kerala High Court

WP(C)/23620/2012 of PIONEER PERSONALIZED HOLIDAYS PVT. LTD Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER on 31 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 23620 of 2012 (B) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- PIONEER PERSONALIZED HOLIDAYS PVT. LTD., AGED 69 YEARS 5TH CROSS ROAD,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH

MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934

WP(C).No. 23620 of 2012 (B)

---------------------------

PETITIONER(S):

-------------

PIONEER PERSONALIZED HOLIDAYS PVT. LTD., AGED 69 YEARS 5TH CROSS ROAD, WELLINGTON ISLAND, KOCHI-3 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR P.D.JOSEPH S/O. LATE THOMAS SEBASTIAN NOW RESIDING AT PULLUMAKKAL HOUSE, CHAKALA COLONY PERUMANOOR, KOCHI-15.

BY ADV. SRI.B.N.SHIVA SHANKAR

RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER R.T.O. OFFICE, MATTANCHERY -682030. R.T.O. OFFICE, MATTANCHERY -682030.

2. THE ERNAKULAM JILLA MOTOR THOZHILALI SANGHAM (BMS) BMS DISTRICT COMMITTEE OFFICE, I.S.PRESS ROAD KOCHI-18. BMS DISTRICT COMMITTEE OFFICE, I.S.PRESS ROAD KOCHI-18.

3. THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682030. KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM-682030.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31-12-2012,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

APPENDIX

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS

P1COPY OF THE LIST OF VEHICLES

P2COPY OF THE BIPARTITE SETTLEMENT DATED 14-9-2012

P3COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 28-3-2012

P4COPY OF THE MINUTES DATED 17-8-2012

P5COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23-8-2012

P6COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 7-9-2012

P7COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17-9-2012

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL

TRUE COPY

P.A. TO JUDGE

V.CHITAMBARESH,J.

= = = = = = = = = = =

W.P.(C)No.23620 of 2012

= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T

It is pointed out that the demand made by the secondrespondent by Exts. P3 and P7 notices have since beenwithdrawn as evidenced by Ext.P8 letter.

2. The first respondent is therefore at liberty to considerthe application, if any, filed by the petitioner for transfer ofownership of the vehicles mentioned in Ext.P1.

The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of.

smm

V.CHITAMBARESH.JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead