Kerala High Court
WP(C)/35854/2019 of SAFEER P.A., Vs THE SECRETARY, on 31 December 2019
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.35854 OF 2019(F) PETITIONER/S: SAFEER P.A., AGED 47 YEARS S/O. KUNHAHAMMED HAJI, PANDARA ARAKKAL HOUSE, WEST KODUR, KODUR P.O, MALAPPURAM
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA,1941
WP(C).No.35854 OF 2019(F)
PETITIONER/S:
SAFEER P.A.,AGED 47 YEARSS/O. KUNHAHAMMED HAJI, PANDARA ARAKKAL HOUSE, WEST KODUR, KODUR P.O, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA
RESPONDENT/S:
THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, CIVIL STATION, MALAPPURAM P O, PIN-676505, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
SRI. BIMAL K NADH- SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is said to be the registered ownerof a stage carriage vehicle bearing Reg.No.KL-08-AS-7281,operating on the route Tirur-Manjeri (via) Vylathur,Edarikode, Changuvetty, Kottakkal, Malapputram andIrumbuzhi, has submitted Ext.P1 request seeking forrevision of the timings of his vehicle.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that he seeks forrevision of timings, in order to avoid clash of timings withother operators and that the same would be to theadvantage of the travelling public.
3. The petitioner asserts that despite submittingExt.P1 representation on 20.11.2019, the same has notbeen considered by the respondent. Hence the petitionerseeks for a direction to the respondent to consider and passappropriate orders on Ext.P1 request.
4. Heard Sri.Saju.J.Vallyara, the learned counsel forthe petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondent.
5. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner hassubmitted Ext.P1 representation, seeking revision oftimings, which is said to be pending since 20.11.2019, Ideem it appropriate to direct the respondent to considerExt.P1 representation, after affording the petitioner and allother affected persons operating in the above route, andpass appropriate orders in accordance with law, asexpeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of sixweeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
ma
Sd/-C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
/True copy/
P.S to Judge
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
PHOTOCOPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 20.11.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL-08-AS-7281.