Kerala High Court
WP(C)/35966/2019 of SIYAD C.N. Vs THE SECRETARY, on 31 December 2019
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941 WP(C).No.35966 OF 2019(U) PETITIONER: SIYAD C.N. AGED 38 YEARS S/O AHAMMED,C.V.LAND,ANJARAKANDY, THALASSERY,KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT: THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941WP(C).No.35966 OF 2019(U)
PETITIONER:
SIYAD C.N.AGED 38 YEARSS/O AHAMMED,C.V.LAND,ANJARAKANDY, THALASSERY,KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENT:
THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION,KANNUR,PIN-670002.
SRI. BIMAL K NATH, SR.GOVT.PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 31st day of December 2019
Petitioner is an existing stage carriage operator on the route Kuthuparamba-Kannur in respect of the stage carriage bearing No.KL 58/K 239.
2. The petitioner has averred that due to other services on the route and unhealthy competition, great inconvenience is being caused to the travelling public.
Hence, the petitioner had submitted Ext.P2 application before the respondent seeking for revision of timings.Petitioner seeks an expeditious disposal of Ext.P2application.
3. Heard Sri.O.D.Sivadas, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Bimal K. Nath, learned GovernmentPleader.
4. Having regard to the fact that Ext.P2 application is pending before the respondent, I deem it appropriate, inexercise of the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondent toconsider Ext.P2 application as expeditiously as possible, atany rate, within a period six weeks from the date of receiptof a copy of this judgment, after affording the petitionerand all other affected parties operating on the route anopportunity of being heard.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
ACM/1.01.2019
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING OF THE RESPONDENT DATED 14.05.2015.
EXHIBIT P2
TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 19.12.2019 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE RESPONDENT.