Uttarakhand High Court

WPSS/1681/2006 of SMT. JANKI PANDEY Vs STATE AND OTHERS on 22 December 2006

COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL Civil Writ Petition No. 1681 of 2006 (S/S) Smt. Janki Pandey W/o Sri Suresh Chandra Pandey Working as Assistant Teacher in Junior High School Hareda Naini, Vikas Khand Bhasia China, District Almora. …..…….. petitioner Versus 1. State of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL AT NAINITAL

Civil Writ Petition No. 1681 of 2006 (S/S)

Smt. Janki Pandey W/o Sri Suresh Chandra Pandey Working as Assistant Teacher in Junior High School Hareda Naini, Vikas Khand Bhasia China, District Almora.

…..…….. petitioner

Versus

1. State of Uttaranchal.

through Secretary Education,

Education Department, Dehradun.

2. Director / Addl. Secretary Education, Uttaranchal, Dehradun. Uttaranchal, Dehradun.

3. Addl. Education Director,

Kumaon Division, Nainital.

4. Addl. District Education Officer (Basic) Udham Singh Nagar. Udham Singh Nagar.

………. Respondents

Mr. S.S. Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Harendra Belwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2) Learned counsel for the parties agree that the writ petition may be disposed of summarily with the direction to respondent No. 3 to dispose of the representation made by the petitioner, in the matter.

Learned counsel for the parties agree that the writ respondent No. 3 to dispose of the representation made by

Page 1 of 2

3) Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner is posted as Assistant Teacher in Junior High School, Hareda Naini, Block Bhasia China, District District Almora. The husband of the petitioner is posted in District Bageshwar. The petitioner seeks her transfer to District Bageshwar where her husband is posted.

4) Considering the facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of summarily with the direction that the representation dated 27.07.2005 (copy Annexure –1 to the writ petition) made by the petitioner, shall be disposed of by respondent No. 3, within a period of two months from the date the certified copy of this Order along with the copy of representation is produced, before the said authority. (Stay Application No. 15653 of 2006 also stands disposed of).

(Prafulla C. Pant, J.)

Dt.: December 22, 2006H.Negi

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead