Kerala High Court
WP(C)/41879/2022 of DEVENDHU.P.B Vs DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION on 30 December 2022
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 41879 OF 2022 PETITIONER: DEVENDHU.P.B, AGED 15 YEARS DAUGHTER OF PRAMOD KUMAR S REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER, PRAMOD KUMAR S.S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI, AGED 43
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 30[TH] DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 9TH POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 41879 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
DEVENDHU.P.B, AGED 15 YEARSDAUGHTER OF PRAMOD KUMAR SREPRESENTED BY HER FATHER,PRAMOD KUMAR S.S/O SREEDHARAN PILLAI,AGED 43 YEARS, DURGABHAVANAM, AYANIKKAATTUKONAMMADAVOOR PALLICKAL P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM , PIN - 695602
BY ADVS.NAVEEN RADHAKRISHNANG.R.BILAHARI
RESPONDENTS:
1DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATIONO/O THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014O/O THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
2KALOLSAVAM COMMITTEE CONVENERADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,O/O THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN - 695014ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,O/O THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION,JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-, PIN - 695014
3DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERO/O THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014O/O THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
4CHAIRMAN APPEAL COMMITTEE,APPEAL COMMITTEE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,O/O THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION.JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695014O/O THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION.JAGATHY,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695014
SMT.ANIMA GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 30.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 30[th] day of December, 2022
The petitioner was a participant in the District School kalolsavam of Thiruvananthapuram Revenue District. Thepetitioner participated in “Ottamthullal” competition. Thepetitioner could not achieve the first place.
2. The petitioner states that the petitioner’sOttamthullal performance was adversely affected as the mikeand sound system provided by the organisers were not properor upto the mark. Though the petitioner filed a statutoryappeal, the appellate authority dismissed the appeal by a non-speaking order.
The petitioner states that the petitioner’s
3. This Court has held in the judgment in W.P.(C)No.40794 of 2022 and connected cases that inadequacy ofinfrastructure cannot be a ground based on which this Court This Court has held in the judgment in W.P.(C)
WP(C) No.41879 of 2022
can interfere in the awarding of marks by the Judges in theSchool Kalolsavam. This Court is not equipped to arrive atsuch factual adjudication in the matter.
In view of the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C)No.40794 of 2022 and connected cases, I find no merit in thewrit petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
spk
Sd/-
N.NAGARESHJUDGE
WP(C) No.41879 of 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41879/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1
Exhibit P1THE COPY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE 4THRESPONDENT ON 24.11.2022Exhibit P2THE COPY OF THE APPEAL LIST DATED NIL