Kerala High Court
RP/1215/2012 of K.T.DEVI Vs KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 RP.No. 1215 of 2012 --------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.27695/2012 DATED 23-11-2012 REVIEW PETITIONER(S): -------------------- K.T. DEVI, W/O.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
RP.No. 1215 of 2012
---------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC.27695/2012 DATED 23-11-2012
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):-------------------- K.T. DEVI, W/O. K.T. KUNJIRAMAN, KUNNATH VEEDU, KONNAKADU P.O, PARAPRA, KASARAGOD DISTRICT - 671533.
BY ADV. SRI.N.K.KARNIS
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.
2. SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR), KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, KASARAGOD -671 121.4. BRANCH MANAGER, VELLARIKUNDU BRANCH, KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD, KASARAGOD - 671 121.5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY SMT.SANJEETHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADERBY SRI.GEORGE BOBAN, SC, K.S.H.B.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J. ================
R.P.No.1215 of 2012
in
W.P.(C) NO. 27695 OF 2012
===================
Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
The writ petition was disposed of by judgment dated 23/11/12
directing that it will be open to the petitioner to seek the benefit of aone time settlement scheme which has been introduced by the 1[st]respondent. Petitioner now says that, but for the judgment, reliefwould have been given to her pursuant to Ext.P8. For that reason,she seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition itself.
2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned standing counsel for the respondents.
3. If as stated by the petitioner, she is eligible for anybenefits under Ext.P8, there is no reason to deprive her of thosebenefits for the reason that this court has rendered the judgment inthe writ petition. Therefore, in view of the submission made, thisreview petition is allowed and the judgment is recalled.
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE