Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38113/2008 of KUMUDA BAI Vs THE STATE OF KERALA on 26 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38113 of 2008(K) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------------ KUMUDA BAI, W/O.VIJAYAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS, GENERAL FOREMAN, GOVERNMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38113 of 2008(K)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------
KUMUDA BAI,W/O.VIJAYAN NAIR, AGED 52 YEARS,GENERAL FOREMAN, GOVERNMENT PRESS,ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
SRI.K.E.HAMZA
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------
1.THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
2.THE DIRECTOR OF PRINTING,TRIVANDRUM.
3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF PRINTING,GOVERNMENT PRESS, ERNAKULAM.
GOVT.PLEADER SRI.SANDESH RAJA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
==============
W.P.(C) NO. 38113 OF 2008 (K)
====================
Dated this the 26[th]day of December, 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner is a General Foreman in the printing department since14.06.2007. Ext.P1 is the order declaring her probation with effect from19.06.2008. According to the petitioner, her next cadre of promotion isAssistant Superintendent to which post she is eligible and is qualified.However, she apprehends that, for want of seniority list in the cadre ofGeneral Foreman, her name would not be considered.
2. In the above circumstances, she has filed Exts.P2 and P3
representations to the 2[nd] respondent to regularize her promotion. She hasalso filed Ext.P4 praying for publication of the seniority list. It is statedthat these representations are pending. In this writ petition, petitionerseeks an order requiring the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders onExt.P2 to P4.
3. In the light of the facts as stated above, I am satisfied thatthe petitioner is justified in seeking the aforesaid prayer.
4. Therefore the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Exts.P2 to P4, if theserepresentations have been received and are pending.
Order shall be passed as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,within 6 weeks of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copyof this writ petition.
Rp
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE