Kerala High Court
Bail Appl./9444/2012 of C.V.ASKAR Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 Bail Appl..No. 9444 of 2012 () ------------------------------ (CRIME N. 1302/2012 OF THE KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT) PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:-:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
Bail Appl..No. 9444 of 2012 ()
------------------------------
(CRIME N. 1302/2012 OF THE KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT)
BP
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:-:
-----------------------------------------
C.V.ASKAR, AGED 24 YEARS
S/O.MUHAMMADALI, RESIDING AT MASKAN HOUSE (CHERIYATH VEETTIL), NEAR KADIRIPALLI, KAKKAD KUNIYIL PEEDIKA, KANNUR.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENTS/COMPALAINANT AND STATE:-:
----------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT. KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
KANNUR TOWN POLICE STATION.
3. STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V.S. SREEJITH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
P. BHAVADASAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No. 9444 of 2012
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 31[st] day of December, 2012.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits that this application has become infructuous. Hencethis application is dismissed as infructuous.
P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE
sb.