Gujarat High Court
SCA/3243/1986 of VARSHA I TRIVEDI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 5 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3243 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 3243 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? ( No. 1 to 5 NO ) -------------------------------------------------------------- VARSHA I TRIVEDIVersus STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR BP TANNA for Petitioner GOVERNMENT PLEADER Mr. M.A. Bukhari for Respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE
Date of decision: 05/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Upon hearing learned counsel Mr. B.P. Tanna appearing for the petitioner, and looking to the prayer claimed in the petition, it appears that the present proceedings by afflux of time have been rendered infructuous and are required to be disposed of accordingly. Present petition therefore is ordered to be disposed of, as having become infructuous by afflux of time. Petition shall stand disposed of accordingly. Rule shall stand discharged.
------