Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/46827/2016 of KAMLESH AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS on 30 December 2016
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No. 111 CRM-M-46827-2016 Decided on : 30.12.2016 Kamlesh and another ..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL Present: Mr.Jitender Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 11]CRMM468272016Decided on: 30.12.2016Kamlesh and anotherPetitionersVERSUS
State of Haryana and others
..... Respondents
CORAMHON-BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBALPresentMr.Jitender Sehrawat, Advocate, for the petitioners.
6666666
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (ORAL)
Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage.Mr.Baljinder Singh Virk, DAG, Haryana, who is present inCourt, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to supply foursets of the paper book to learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 3, duringthe course of the day.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that thepetitionershave married each other against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8 andon account of this act on their part, they are under threat of beingeliminated at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8. In view of the above,seeking protection, a representation dated 27.12.2016 (Annexure P-4)was made on behalf of the petitioners to the Superintendent of Police,Panipat but to no avail. |
In the above circumstances, the petitioners have approachedthis Court through the present petition.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter,particularly the validity of the alleged marriage, the Superintendent ofPolice, Panipat (respondent No.2) is directed to forthwith consider theaforesaid representation dated 27.12.2016 (Annexure P-4) made onbehalf of the petitioners and thereafter take appropriate action on theSame as 1S deemed fit in accordance with law to ensure the protection oflife and liberty of the petitioners, The petition stands disposed of accordingly.