Kerala High Court
WP(C)/30380/2012 of VISWAMBHARAN Vs THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE on 31 December 2012
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934 WP(C).No. 30380 of 2012 (V) --------------------------- PETITIONER : ------------ VISWAMBHARAN, S/O.VASU, V.S. BHAVAN,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
MONDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/10TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C).No. 30380 of 2012 (V)
---------------------------
PETITIONER :------------
VISWAMBHARAN,
S/O.VASU, V.S. BHAVAN, SREENIVASAPURAM, VATTAPLAMOODU, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.RAJESH
SRI.K.M.ALEXANDER
RESPONDENTS :
--------------
1. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST, PIN-695101
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST, PIN-695 141
3. THANKAMANI,
KUNNUVILA VEEDU, CUTTING, CHERUNIYOOR P.O., VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, DIST PIN-685 142
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.J.JOSE AEDAIODI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON31-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RKM
TRUE COPY
PA TO JUDGE
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------- Dated, this the 31[st] day of December, 2012
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J.
Petitioner has approached this Court complaining ofalleged harassment by the police authorities.
2. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,would submit that a complaint was received from the thirdrespondent to the effect that petitioner has not completedconstruction of building which he had agreed after receiving Rs.7lakhs. Police only advised the petitioner to complete theconstruction, it is submitted. It is submitted that no crime has beenregistered and there is no harassment. We record the saidsubmission and close the writ petition without prejudice to anyother rights available to the petitioner.
(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.
MS
( K. HARILAL)
JUDGE.