Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42085/2017 of DEVARAJ Vs SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 42085 of 2017 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- DEVARAJ, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 42085 of 2017 (I)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
DEVARAJ, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O SANKARAN, CHAKKAMADATHIL, VATANAPPILLY BEACH, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 614.
BY ADV. SRI.K.I.SAGEER IBRAHIM
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANTHIKKAD POLICE STATION, ANTHIKKAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 641.2. MARY, W/O PULIKKAL MICHLE, AGED 70 YEARS, KARAMUCH VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICDT - 680 601.3. JOLLY, AGED 42, S/O PULIKKAL MICHLE, AGED 70 YEARS, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 601.
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI P.G.PRAMOD.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 42085 of 2017 (I)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:
----------------------
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.516/2016 OF SRO ANTHIKKADDATED 15-03-2016.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 18-07-2017 IN I.A.NO.11324/2017IN O.S.NO.3281/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.MUNSIFF, THRISSUR.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS:---------------------- NIL
dkr
//TRUE COPY//PA TO JUDGE
A.M. SHAFFIQUE & ASHOK MENON, JJ.
-------------------------------------------W.P.(C) No. 42085 of 2017
------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Shaffique, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner had approached this Court for policeprotection contending that though an interim order hasbeenpassed by the Civil Court, the respondents 2 and 3 arecreating obstruction to the pathway. He has filed Ext.P3complaint before the Sub Inspector of Police, but no action hasbeen taken in the matter.
2. Having regard to the nature of the order we intend topass, no notice is being issued to the private respondents.
3. The 1[st] respondent shall consider Ext.P3 complaintand take appropriate action in accordance with law. The WritPetition is disposed of with the above observation. No costs.
Sd/-A.M. SHAFFIQUE Judge
Sd/-
ASHOK MENON
Judge