Uttarakhand High Court
WPSB/1687/2002 of R.S. BISHT and ORS. Vs U.P.RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM LTD. and ORS. on 27 November 2002
2002 Hon. Irshad Hussain,J. Hon. M.M.Ghildiyal,J. Heard Miss Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri A.K.Joshi, counsel for the respondents. The grievance of the petitioners is that although recommendations of the 5th pay Commission have not been implemented, but the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Hon. Irshad Hussain,J. Hon. M.M.Ghildiyal,J.
Heard Miss Menka Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri A.K.Joshi, counsel for the respondents.
The grievance of the petitioners is that although recommendations of the 5[th] pay Commission have not been implemented, but the petitioners are getting notional pay and the allowances as contemplated by the 5[th]Pay Commission. However, they are not being paid medical reimbursement on the notional pay. Their representation is pending disposal with the respondent authorities.
The respondent authorities are directed to take decision on the representation of the petitioners dated 18.9.2002 contained in Annexure 2 to the writ petition within a period of one month. With this, the petition is disposed of.
(M.M.Ghildiyal, J.) (Irshad Hussain, J.)
Dt. 27.11.2002
A