Kerala High Court
WP(C)/42004/2017 of SAJU M.D. Vs THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 42004 of 2017 ( A ) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------- SAJU M.D., S/O.DHAMODHARAN, MADHAVATH HOUSE, KUPPADI.P.O.,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 42004 of 2017 (A)
----------------------------
PETITIONER :
--------------------
SAJU M.D., S/O.DHAMODHARAN, MADHAVATH HOUSE, KUPPADI.P.O., SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD.
BY ADV. SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN
RESPONDENT(S):---------------------------
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
WAYANAD, PIN-673 121
2. THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, SULTHAN BATHERY, PIN-673 122
3. THE SULTHAN BATHERY MUNICIPALITY,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
SULTHAN BATHERY, PIN-673 122
R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.C.VIDHYA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 42004 of 2017 (A)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 5/12/2017.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO JUDGE
sts
----------------------------------
W.P.(C) NO.42004 OF 2017
----------------------------------
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
I see that issues similar to those raised in this writpetition have already been considered by another learnedSingle Judge which has culminated in a judgment reported as Rajesh v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority (2014(3) KLT 341). I am in respectful confirmation ofthe directions contained therein. I therefore see noreason to deviate there from.
2. I see that the petitioner has submitted an application for a contract carriage permit. He has filedthis writ petition seeking directions to the respondents toreceive the fee for application for such permit and also fora direction that he be issued the permit in terms of law.
3. In view of the judgment above referred I dispose ofthis writ petition also directing the respondents to issuepermit of the petitioner as applied for him in conformity W.P.(C) NO.42004/ 2017 2
with the legal requirements and prescriptions of theapplicable Act and Rules within a period of one monthfrom the date of receipt of a certified copy of thisjudgment.
SD/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
IAP