Kerala High Court
WP(C)/41895/2017 of THOMAS CHACKO Vs STATE OF KERALA on 29 December 2017
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939 WP(C).No. 41895 of 2017 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- THOMAS CHACKO AGED 42 YEARS, S/O
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE &THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017/8TH POUSHA, 1939
WP(C).No. 41895 of 2017 (J)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):------------- THOMAS CHACKO AGED 42 YEARS, S/O K.C.THOMAS RESIDING AT KURISUMOOTTIL HOSUE, WARRIAM ROAD, KARITHALA DESOM, M.G. ROAD P.O., ERNAKULAM-682016. BY ADV. SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
*(ADDITIONAL RESPONDENT NOS.5 AND 6 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED29.12.2017 IN IA NO.21133/2017)
R1-R3 BY ADV. ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION
R1 TO R3 BY SRI.P.G.PRAMOD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29-12-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 41895 of 2017 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS-----------------------EXHIBIT P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE SITE MAHAZAR OF ELECTRICAL SECTION,THRIKKAKKARA.
EXHIBIT P2: PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT RECEIPT DATED 15.12.2017 OFTHE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3: PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4: COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS----------------------- NIL
//TRUE COPY//
jg-29/12
PS TO JUDGE.
A.M.SHAFFIQUE & ASHOK MENON, JJ.
------------------------------------------- WP(C) No.41895 of 2017
------------------------------------------- Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2017
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
J U D G M E N T
A.M.Shaffique, J.
This writ petition has been filed seeking adequate policeprotection for the life and property of the petitioner alleging thatthere is threat from respondent No.4, his wife and daughter, whoare now impleaded as additional respondent Nos.5 and 6.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thethreat is on account of the fact that he had preferred a complaintagainst the fourth respondent alleging that separate electricitymeters had been installed by the fourth respondent in the tenantedpremises. He also complains that the fourth respondent had giventhe tenanted premises on sub-lease. KSEB has also taken actionagainst the fourth respondent and on account of the same, thefourth respondent being on inimical attitude, has threatened thepetitioner that he will be attacked and finished.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitionerthat the Police had already intervened in the matter and had warnedthe fourth respondent.
Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation, this writpetition is disposed of without notice to respondent Nos.4 to 6 asunder:
If there is any further threat from respondent Nos.4 to 6, the Policeshall, on a complaint being filed by the petitioner, look into thematter and do the needful.
A .M.SHAFFIQUE
JUDGE
jg
ASHOK MENON JUDGE