Kerala High Court

WP(C)/38042/2008 of M/S.MOBNET MOBILE Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES. on 26 December 2008

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38042 of 2008(D) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- M/S MOBNET MOBILE, COURT ROAD, MANJERI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

FRIDAY, THE 26TH DECEMBER 2008 / 5TH POUSHA 1930

WP(C).No. 38042 of 2008(D)

--------------------------

PETITIONER:

---------------

M/S MOBNET MOBILE, COURT ROAD,

MANJERI, REPRESENTED BY ITS

MANAGING PARTNER - P.K. ABBAS.

BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),

COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM.

3. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, MANJERI.

4. THE INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, MALAPPURAM AT MANJERI.

SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR TAXES SRI.TEK CHAND

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

ON 26/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

FOLLOWING:

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J----------------------------------------W.P.(C).NO.38042 of 2008 - D

------------------------------

Dated this the 26[th] day of December, 2008

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

J U D G M E N T--------------------

Having perused the contents of Ext.P1 assessment order,the grounds in Ext.P2 appeal and the pleadings in the writpetition and having heard the learned counsel for the petitionerand the learned Government Pleader, this writ petition is ordereddirecting that, if the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.50,000/-within a period of three weeks, any recovery on the basis ofExt.P1 including Ext.P4 will stand suspended until final disposal ofExt.P2 appeal. If such deposit is made, the appellate authoritywill consider expediting the appeal by taking it out of turn anddispose it of within a period of four months from the date ofreceipt of such deposit. The petitioner shall produce certifiedcopy of this judgment before the appellate authority.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

bkn/-

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead