Kerala High Court
WP(C)/38233/2008 of DRISHYA GOPI Vs DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION on 30 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930 WP(C).No. 38233 of 2008(B) -------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------- DRISHYA GOPI, AGED 15 YEARS, (MINOR) STANDARD X, GIRLS HIGH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 30TH DECEMBER 2008 / 9TH POUSHA 1930
WP(C).No. 38233 of 2008(B)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
DRISHYA GOPI, AGED 15 YEARS, (MINOR)
STANDARD X, GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL,PUNALUR, RESIDING
AT MANGALATHU HOUSE, KARAVALOOR, PUNALUR, QUILON DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER
SHRI.P.N.GOPINATHAN NAIR.
BY ADV. SRI.M.POLY MATHAI
SRI.P.CHELLAPPAN
RESPONDENTS:
-------------------------
1. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
OFFICE OF D.P.I.,TRIVANDRUM.
2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, OFFICE OF
D.D. KOLLAM,CHAIRMAN OF THE APPEAL COMMITTEE
FOR THE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL YOUTH FESTVAL
COMPETITIONS 2008-2009
BY GOVT. PLEADER SHRI. LAKSHMI NARAYANAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
Page 1 of 2
ON 30/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
------------------------------------------------------------ W.P(C) NO: 38233 OF 2008
----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30[th] December,2008.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner was a participant in the item Ottanthullal in therevenue District School Festival at Chathanoor. The allegation isthat there were defects in the microphone set used in the stageduring the performance.
2. Heard the learned Govt. Pleader. It is submitted that thereis a difference of 55 marks between the petitioner and thecandidate who secured highest marks and the petitioner is able tosecure only the fourth place.
3. I do not think that there is any ground to interfere with the decision of the appeal committee. No other vitiating circumstancesis pointed out in the writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed.
jj
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIRJudge
K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.
---------------------------------------------------- M.F.A.NO:
-----------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT
Dated:
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…