Uttarakhand High Court
WPMB/1141/2003 of M/S NARULA CONSTRUCTION Vs STATE and ANR. on 22 December 2003
of 2003 Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J. Heard Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.B.S. Negi learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K.P. Upadhayaya learned Standing Counsel for the State. In view of the judgment of the Allahabad High Court in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
WPMB No. 1141 of 2003
Hon. P.C. Verma, A.C.J. Hon. Rajesh Tandon, J.
Heard Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.B.S. Negi learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K.P. Upadhayaya learned Standing Counsel for the State.
In view of the judgment of the Allahabad High Court in case of Tejveer Singh Vs State of U.P. reported in 1997(29) ALR 687, the petitioner was liable to pay fixed stamp duty at the rate of Rs. 100/- only and not the stamp duty calculated on ad valorem basis. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed. No order as to costs.
(R.T, J.) (P.C.V., A.C, J.)
G/H